![]() Let’s be clear: If you are simply using stem cells, the growth factors that might be made-and there’s no guarantee a cell will make growth factors-are less likely to be skin-specific. Stem cells can also be encouraged to grow skin-targeted growth factors by leaving them in the same growth media as a fibroblast. This is known as induced pluripotent stem cells (IPS). Instead, stem cells are being induced to make fibroblasts by implanting fibroblast DNA into a ghost cell. Although they have potential in fat injections and face-lifts to offer more stable tissue replacement, they are otherwise not part of skin care as you know it. Human stem cells are primarily being harvested from adults and have, therefore, become less controversial than in the past. They are not making growth factors or activating wound-healing the way stem cell technology does. Often, they are a plant extract and offer a similarly modest impact on the skin. Plant stem cells appear to provide some modest improvements in the skin, but they are primarily formulated in conjunction with other actives or peptides because they are not very active themselves. Many companies offer plant stem cells, but they are not like human stem cells and do not provide any of the benefits of human stem cells. This article will discuss the pros and cons of one of the most exciting technological advancements in skin care. However, there remains a great deal of confusion about the differences between growth factors, stem cells, plant stem cells and other related technologies. The use of stem cells in skin care and esthetic medicine has generated a lot of excitement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |